Bringing matter, to matter: βWild ideasβ about βreadinessβ in the transition from the Early Years Foundation Stage to the Key Stage 1 National Curriculum in England
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, Ahead of Print.
βReadinessβ and transition are topics of ongoing debate in relation to early childhood education. Critiques of schoolification and the impact of a βschool-readinessβ agenda on policy and practice point to a tendency for increased formalisation of learning as children progress through their early years of schooling. In England, these first years of school-based education involve a transition between different and distinct educational frameworks, from the Early Years Foundation Stage to the National Curriculum in Key Stage 1. This transition can be problematic as tensions emerge between different pedagogical traditions, thus creating a potentially challenging experience for children as they progress from one educational context to the next. In this paper I argue that post-humanism can offer a useful theoretical framing to explore and critique this transition, opening space to question the role of matter in shaping experiences of transition in early years educational spaces. The paper is inspired by diffractive approaches to scholarship that encourage creativity and experimentation, making space for the researchers own co-constituted experiences in the production of new ideas and theories. The theoretically based discussion considers the notion of a βproblem spaceβ in relation to early years transitions, before exploring post-human perspectives and asking the question βcan matter, matter differentlyβ in transitional experiences. The paper concludes by posing a series of questions designed to prompt further discussion and debate about βreadinessβ and transition, putting the focus on childβmatter intra-actions and their potential for supporting a more complex and nuanced understanding of transition in the early years.
βReadinessβ and transition are topics of ongoing debate in relation to early childhood education. Critiques of schoolification and the impact of a βschool-readinessβ agenda on policy and practice point to a tendency for increased formalisation of learning as children progress through their early years of schooling. In England, these first years of school-based education involve a transition between different and distinct educational frameworks, from the Early Years Foundation Stage to the National Curriculum in Key Stage 1. This transition can be problematic as tensions emerge between different pedagogical traditions, thus creating a potentially challenging experience for children as they progress from one educational context to the next. In this paper I argue that post-humanism can offer a useful theoretical framing to explore and critique this transition, opening space to question the role of matter in shaping experiences of transition in early years educational spaces. The paper is inspired by diffractive approaches to scholarship that encourage creativity and experimentation, making space for the researchers own co-constituted experiences in the production of new ideas and theories. The theoretically based discussion considers the notion of a βproblem spaceβ in relation to early years transitions, before exploring post-human perspectives and asking the question βcan matter, matter differentlyβ in transitional experiences. The paper concludes by posing a series of questions designed to prompt further discussion and debate about βreadinessβ and transition, putting the focus on childβmatter intra-actions and their potential for supporting a more complex and nuanced understanding of transition in the early years.