Special Educatorsβ Experiences Navigating Tensions When Serving Students Labeled With Emotional/Behavioral Disorders
Remedial and Special Education, Ahead of Print.
Special educators often work in school contexts that are not oriented toward their studentsβ strengths and needs, resulting in tensionβmisalignment between their responsibility to students and their schoolsβ resources and expectations. Using grounded theory, we explored five teachersβ experiences of tension when serving students labeled with emotional/behavioral disorders in self-contained classes. We found teachers experienced tensions regarding studentsβ belonging, their academic instructional roles, and their roles supporting studentsβ behavior. Tensions reflected ways schools were not oriented toward studentsβ strengths and support needs. Yet, teachersβ perspectives on tensions varied greatly. Grounded in humanizing perspectives on students, some teachers experienced tension with colleagues who resisted including students and honoring studentsβ support needs. Other teachers held deficit-based, legalistic views of students, which underlay their acceptance of (or even advocacy for) exclusion. Findings indicate the centrality of educatorsβ conceptions of disability for how they conceptualize and fulfill their roles in serving students with disabilities.
Special educators often work in school contexts that are not oriented toward their studentsβ strengths and needs, resulting in tensionβmisalignment between their responsibility to students and their schoolsβ resources and expectations. Using grounded theory, we explored five teachersβ experiences of tension when serving students labeled with emotional/behavioral disorders in self-contained classes. We found teachers experienced tensions regarding studentsβ belonging, their academic instructional roles, and their roles supporting studentsβ behavior. Tensions reflected ways schools were not oriented toward studentsβ strengths and support needs. Yet, teachersβ perspectives on tensions varied greatly. Grounded in humanizing perspectives on students, some teachers experienced tension with colleagues who resisted including students and honoring studentsβ support needs. Other teachers held deficit-based, legalistic views of students, which underlay their acceptance of (or even advocacy for) exclusion. Findings indicate the centrality of educatorsβ conceptions of disability for how they conceptualize and fulfill their roles in serving students with disabilities.