Educational Administration Quarterly, Ahead of Print.
Purpose: In the HBO comedy series, Vice Principals, two white men vice principals respond to the hiring of a Black woman high school principal with physical, emotional, and workplace violence. The purpose of this study was to explore (1) white men educational leaders’ perceptions of a Black woman educational leader, and (2) their responses to being passed over for promotion by a Black woman. Methods: Using whiteness as property as the theoretical framework, this study uses a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis applied to the first season of the television series (nine 30-min episodes) to uncover the relationships and power dynamics between the three main characters. Findings: White men are the most likely to hold the high school principalship. The findings highlight how the series’ white male characters worked together to force the Black woman out of her role as principal, based on the assumption that either of them was more deserving of the position than her. Although fictitious, these examples parallel the real-world experiences of Black women educational leaders in today's public schools. Implications: This study contributes to scholarship about why Black educators may leave the profession, particularly highlighting the influence of unsupportive school contexts, and more specifically, the gendered racism experienced by Black women. Superintendent preparation programs can consider coursework that encourages aspiring district leaders to identify specific mentoring and support for Black women principals and principals from other marginalized backgrounds. Finally, this scholarship highlights how popular media can be a useful data source for educational leadership research.

Educational Administration Quarterly, Ahead of Print.
Purpose: In this mixed methods study, we delve into the complex realm of perceptions of critical race theory (CRT) in the United States. The public perspective of CRT has implications for K12 education, particularly as it relates to teaching literature and social studies. In our investigation, we focus on school district superintendents’ perception of the impact on schools and education. Research Approach: Using quantitative (a Likert-type survey with open-ended items) and qualitative instruments (a semi-structured interview protocol), the study aims to unravel superintendents’ awareness, views, and understanding of CRT. Findings: Data revealed a range of superintendent perceived familiarity levels, with some leaders possessing an in-depth understanding of CRT while others are less acquainted. Concerns surrounding the potential divisiveness, politicization, and suitability for CRT in K12 settings emerged as significant themes. Implications: The research underscores the need for professional development and reliable information to enhance educational leaders’ comprehension of CRT. It also highlights the importance of approaching CRT cautiously in light of its complex and contested nature. The study advocates for inclusive and accurate history education and recommends effective integration of CRT, leader preparation, and policy implications. The recommendations consider the intricate landscape of CRT in K-12 educational leadership. It emphasizes the significance of promoting inclusive environments to address racial disparities and promote equitable learning.